I’m guessing that more than 80% of my interactions with PR end with me saying no to their pitch.
That can’t be good for anyone given we are all selling our time!
So here’s an idea for a new dialog.
What if I were to post the stories I write here after they are published and explain the choices that went into them? What content made it? Why other content did not. Why I decided an interview would not add to the piece?
Or I could do an annotated Word version of the story, if my editors are a bit squeamish about having the process so exposed.
Any interest, anyone?
My desired outcome would be more targeted PR with fewer knockbacks and less time wasted all round.
Any opinions on this kind of dialog?